The practice of placing at-risk inmates in dry cells at Invercargill Prison has persisted, despite previous condemnation from officials and human rights organizations. Inmates identified as suicidal have been subjected to this treatment at least 14 times since March 2019, according to data obtained under the Official Information Act.

Dry cells, located within the prison’s Intervention and Support Unit (ISU), are designed primarily for monitoring prisoners suspected of concealing contraband. These cells lack basic amenities, including toilets and drinking water. Following an investigation by then-Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier, it was determined that this practice breaches United Nations standards aimed at preventing inhumane treatment of prisoners.

While Corrections officials state that at-risk inmates are usually placed in ‘safer cells’—which are equipped to minimize ligature points for self-harm—the data shows that on 13 occasions since 2019, the safer cells were occupied, leaving staff with no choice but to use dry cells. Neil Beales, Deputy Commissioner for Men’s Prisons, explained that the safety of inmates must be prioritized, stating, “Nobody is saying that is optimal and preferable, but unfortunately it’s unavoidable in those circumstances.”

The situation has drawn criticism from various watchdogs. During his visit to Invercargill Prison, Boshier noted that inmates were provided with cardboard receptacles instead of toilets, a clear violation of Rule 15 of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. This rule mandates that prisoners have access to adequate sanitary facilities.

In 2021, Boshier reiterated his concerns regarding the use of dry cells in other prisons, describing them as “desolate and barren.” He emphasized that placing at-risk individuals in such conditions is never appropriate. In 2023, the Office of the Inspectorate echoed these concerns, with Chief Inspector Janis Adair highlighting that dry cells were sometimes used beyond their intended purpose due to a lack of adequate at-risk cells.

Advocacy groups have been vocal in their condemnation of the continued use of dry cells. Lisa Woods, the advocacy and movement building director for Amnesty International New Zealand, characterized the situation as an “utter failure” and a breach of international human rights standards. “This shows the system is utterly broken,” Woods asserted, emphasizing that every individual has the right to dignity, which is consistently being undermined.

Additionally, Cosmo Jeffery, spokesperson for the Howard League for Penal Reform, who experienced time in a dry cell himself, described the conditions as “totally inhumane.” He questioned the lack of progress in addressing this issue, suggesting that there is no real desire for change within the system.

The fluctuating population at Invercargill Prison, which has ranged between 110 and 182 inmates, has contributed to the ongoing challenges. Beales acknowledged that there has been an increase in inmates arriving with significant mental health, drug, and alcohol issues. He expressed the difficulty in managing these cases, stating that the aim is to ensure safety for both inmates and staff.

When questioned about the lack of additional safer cells within the prison, Beales explained that resource allocation has focused on other areas of the prison network. Recently, Corrections opened 500 new high-security beds at Waikeria Prison and 96 dedicated mental health and addiction beds, indicating a strategy to relieve pressure on the system.

While the future of dry cells remains uncertain, Beales noted that their use for at-risk inmates will depend on available capacity. The ongoing use of these facilities raises significant ethical and human rights concerns that demand attention from both the public and authorities responsible for prison management.

The practice of placing at-risk inmates in dry cells at Invercargill Prison has persisted despite longstanding criticism and prior admonitions from oversight bodies. Corrections officials have confirmed that inmates identified as suicidal have been confined to these bare rooms, which lack both toilets and drinking water, on at least 14 occasions since 2019. This troubling trend raises significant concerns regarding the treatment of vulnerable prisoners and compliance with international standards.

In 2019, then-Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier determined that the use of dry cells violated United Nations standards designed to protect the dignity of prisoners and prevent torture. According to data obtained through the Official Information Act, these dry cells, situated in the prison’s Intervention and Support Unit (ISU), are primarily intended for monitoring inmates suspected of concealing contraband. Despite the designation of safer cells—rooms free from ligature points intended for at-risk inmates—reports indicate that these safer cells are often full, resulting in the continued use of dry cells.

Neil Beales, Deputy Commissioner for Men’s Prisons, acknowledged the difficult choices faced by staff, stating, “We still have a responsibility to make sure that that person is properly looked after… Nobody is saying that is optimal and preferable, but unfortunately it’s unavoidable in those circumstances.” The duration of stays in these dry cells can vary, sometimes lasting only a few hours or extending overnight.

Multiple watchdogs have raised alarms over Corrections’ ongoing reliance on this practice. During a visit, Boshier noted that inmates held in dry cells were provided with cardboard receptacles instead of proper sanitation facilities, directly contravening Rule 15 of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, also known as the Nelson Mandela Rules. This rule mandates that all prisoners have access to adequate sanitary installations.

In 2021, Boshier reiterated concerns about the use of dry cells for at-risk prisoners in facilities such as Christchurch Men’s and Whanganui Prisons. He stated, “Dry cells are a desolate and barren environment for prisoners who are already vulnerable. I do not consider it is ever appropriate to put at-risk people into cells with no toilets or drinking water.”

In 2023, Janis Adair, Chief Inspector of Corrections, echoed these sentiments in a report concerning separation and isolation across the prison system. “We observed that the dry cells were sometimes being used outside their intended purpose… This is not appropriate as the dry cells are especially restrictive,” she noted.

Advocacy groups have been vocal about the need for accountability. Lisa Woods, Advocacy and Movement Building Director at Amnesty International New Zealand, characterized the ongoing use of dry cells as “beyond appalling” and a clear failure of the system to respect international human rights standards. “Over and over again, the criminal justice system is failing to treat people in its care with dignity, and this is unacceptable,” she added.

The population at Invercargill Prison has fluctuated between 110 and 182 inmates since 2019, with an increasing number of arrivals experiencing significant mental health issues, substance abuse challenges, and other vulnerabilities. Beales explained that the rise in at-risk individuals complicates the situation, stating, “I know that our managers at those sites will do everything in their power not to use those cells. But when you’re stuck with nowhere else to put them that is safe… they have to make the best decisions for the safety of the people that we’re managing and also the safety of our staff.”

When questioned about the lack of additional safer cells in the facility, Beales indicated that Corrections had prioritized investments in other areas of the prison network. “What we’ve done is focus resources where they’re going to give us better bang for buck,” he stated, referencing the recent opening of 500 new high-security beds at Waikeria Prison and 96 dedicated mental health and addiction beds.

As the issue of dry cells continues to provoke debate, the future of their use for at-risk prisoners at Invercargill Prison remains uncertain, dependent largely on the facility’s capacity to accommodate inmates safely. The ongoing situation highlights the pressing need for reform in how vulnerable individuals are treated within the penal system.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accused Israel of “quite clearly” breaching international law by withholding humanitarian aid from civilians in Gaza. In a recent statement, he emphasized that while he respects formal processes for assessing violations, such actions constitute a “breach of decent humanity and morality.” This declaration marks a significant moment in Australia’s foreign policy stance regarding the ongoing conflict in the region.

Albanese’s remarks come as the humanitarian situation in Gaza deteriorates, with reports indicating severe shortages of essential supplies, including food, medicine, and clean water. The Prime Minister’s comments reflect growing international concern over the impact of the conflict on innocent civilians.

During a press briefing, Albanese stated, “The situation in Gaza is dire, and it is crucial that aid is allowed to reach those in need.” He reiterated Australia’s commitment to supporting humanitarian efforts while calling for an immediate ceasefire to allow for the safe delivery of aid.

Pressure Mounts for Recognition of Palestinian State

According to Australian correspondent Oliver Peterson, there is increasing pressure on the Albanese government to follow France in formally recognizing a Palestinian state. This move could signify a shift in Australia’s diplomatic approach towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Peterson highlighted that recognition of a Palestinian state is being discussed in political circles, reflecting a broader international trend. “Many are urging the Australian government to take a stronger stance in support of Palestinian rights,” he noted. The debate around recognition is intensifying as the humanitarian crisis unfolds, prompting calls from various political leaders and advocacy groups within Australia.

While Albanese has expressed support for a two-state solution, the complexity of the situation poses challenges for any immediate policy changes. The Prime Minister’s comments on Israel’s actions are likely to resonate with those advocating for increased humanitarian assistance and recognition of Palestinian sovereignty.

As the conflict continues, international leaders and organizations are closely monitoring Australia’s response. The potential for Australia to take a more definitive stance on recognizing a Palestinian state could have significant implications for its diplomatic relations in the region and beyond.

In summary, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s recent accusations against Israel highlight a critical moment in Australia’s foreign policy. With increasing pressure to recognize a Palestinian state and respond to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the government’s next steps will be closely scrutinized both domestically and internationally.

A teenager who suffered years of sexual abuse confronted his abuser in court, expressing his anger and desire for justice. In a moving statement, the teen, who has a head injury, addressed the court during the sentencing of Shane Bell, 49, at the Christchurch District Court. He urged that no other young person should endure what he experienced.

During the hearing, the teenager recounted how Bell’s actions led to feelings of insecurity and mistrust. “I find it hard at times to express myself,” he told the court. “I am angry with him, with what he did to me.” His father, who accompanied him, shared his own feelings of betrayal, stating he once trusted Bell around his son. “I don’t have any trust in him now after what he has done to my son,” he said. This experience has heightened his awareness of who he allows around his other children to prevent similar trauma.

The emotional impact of the abuse extended beyond the boy to his entire family. The father noted that they continue to deal with the residual trauma. A pre-sentence report revealed that Bell posed a high risk of reoffending, demonstrating distorted thinking and a lack of remorse. He faced multiple charges, including sexual connection with a young person and possessing objectionable materials.

Bell abused the victim over an 18-month period, during which he performed sexual acts while instructing the boy not to disclose the incidents. The victim was too frightened to come forward, believing he had been assaulted approximately 50 times. In addition to the abuse, Bell also supplied the boy with cannabis and alcohol during these encounters.

Bell’s criminal activities were brought to the attention of Polish authorities through a cellphone that received child exploitation material. In early 2023, this information was shared with New Zealand police, leading to a search of Bell’s home where multiple devices were seized. Investigators discovered over 1,000 files on his laptop and cellphone, including images involving young boys and animals. His search history included more than 100 queries related to child exploitation and bestiality.

During the sentencing, Judge Gerard Lynch condemned Bell’s actions as “deplorable, vile and degrading.” The judge noted Bell’s primary concern while in custody was the welfare of his cats, which highlighted his lack of accountability for his actions. Judge Lynch emphasized that Bell required an intensive sexual treatment program to address his behavior, stating that he did not accept Bell’s apology.

Ultimately, Bell was sentenced to six years and three months in prison and was placed on the Child Sex Offenders Register as part of his punishment.

For those affected by similar issues, support is available. If you or someone you know is at risk or has experienced sexual assault, immediate help can be sought by calling emergency services. The confidential crisis helpline Safe to Talk is available at 0800 044 334 or via text at 4334, operating 24/7. Additionally, Male Survivors Aotearoa and other organizations provide confidential support across New Zealand.